It makes more sense after seeing the video. You're in auto exposure mode "P" on the screen and the flashing icon is showing you that you've not...
[IMG]
I think that's because there's a small microswitch in the film compartment. Bob
If I remember correctly, the battery condition indicator works like this; 3 bars on solid.....fully charged 2 bars on solid.....1/2 charge 1 bar...
Yes, Brian works hard to keep the site interesting and informative....a valuable resource. My personal 'go to' review site is;...
I have one of those too. It's far more portable than the 645Z (with lenses) but the files aren't of the same quality. Bob
Pre-purchase justification was often fraught with danger so I now practise post-purchase justification. I'll freely admit that I often fail but...
I already had some P67 and P645 lenses that I was using on a tilt-shift adapter with my Canon bodies so I was primed as it were....although I...
You're welcome, Ray, and I apear to be the inverse of yourself. All my experience (and most of my equipment) is Canon based but I also have a...
Hi Ray, They're actually not TIFF files but Canon used the extension .TIF for their first offering. You can rename the files as .CRW and then...
The EF-M flange distance is 24mm shorter than the FD distance.....why would optical correction be required? Bob
Whilst not having a 'retro' appearance, Eos-M bodies will happily accept FD lenses.
The CZJ 180/2.8 Sonnar is one of the better offerings and you'd perhaps you'd also enjoy the 120/2.8 Biometar, Harry, which is much more compact...
Walk through any park or down any street and you'll see people who are carrying 10, 15 or even 20 kgs of excess weight and they're carrying it 24...
I'm not a 'switcher'....all my 35mm gear is Canon but I arrived here via the Pentax forum by virtue of having a 645Z and a selection of 645 and 67...
You're welcome.....consider the lens properties (focal length and aperture) as the constant and the sensor/film size as the variable.
There is no crop factor involved. A medium format 300mm lens on a 35mm body gives the same FoV as a Canon 300mm lens.....ie, I see the same FoV...
The field of view is that part which is captured (or cropped) by the sensor so it behaves eactly the same as a Canon 300/4 lens.
Some of the old lenses have a rendering that is slowly being lost as we progress towards the mythical 'optical excellence' that computer predicted...
Lost in France
Separate names with a comma.
