Convince me

Discussion in 'Post Processing, Printing, and Scanning' started by Grumpy John, Jun 29, 2023.

  1. Grumpy John

    Grumpy John Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2020
    Messages:
    85
    Location:
    Outer SE suburbs of Melbourne
    Equipment:
    EOS 7D MkII
    EOS R6
    Canon RF16
    Canon RF85
    Canon RF24-240
    Canon EF 50
    Canon EF 85
    Sigma 150-600mm 5.0-6.3
    Tamron 28-300
    Canon Speedlite 580EXII
    Yongnuo YN14EX Ring Flash
    My Adobe subscription gives me access to Photoshop, Lightroom and Lightroom Classic.
    I currently use Photoshop in combination with Bridge and Adobe Camera Raw. I believe that my current PP setup will give me better results that Lightroom alone.
    Can anyone give me enough reasons to start using Lightroom?
     

  2. johnsey

    johnsey Site Moderator Staff Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2017
    Messages:
    2,215
    Location:
    Fargo, ND
    Equipment:
    5dMk4, 5dsR, 5dMk2, 20D, 70-200 2.8L IS, 100mm 2.8 Macro USM, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 17-40mm 4.0L, TS-E 24mm 3.5L II, Rokinon 14mm 2.8; Pixma Pro-100
    My primary argument is that LR does 90% of Photoshop and 100% of why you would use bridge. It manages the file from import through develop and print. Bridge is clunky compared to LR to the point I worked from 2006-2012 without it just managing files themselves and then using my folder workflow in PS, then i started using LR about 2012.
     

Share This Page